Cases

VVGB European Court Representations

  1. Case T-191/09, HIT Trading and Berkman Forwarding v Commission (trade; pending)
  2. Case T-150/09, Ningbo Yonghong Fastners Co., Ltd. v Council  (trade; pending)
  3. Case T-354/08, Spira v Commission (competition; pending)
  4. Case T-120/08, Arch Chemicals Inc., Others and CEFIC v Commission (biocides regulation; pending)
  5. Case C-6/08 P, US Steel Košice s.r.o. v Commission (trade; pending)
  6. Case T-330/07, Kuiburi Fruit Canning v Council (trade; settled)
  7. Case T-108/07, Spira v Commission (competition; pending)
  8. Case T-27/07, US Steel Košice v. Commission (trade; settled)
  9. Case T-22/07, US Steel Košice v. Commission (trade; settled)
  10. Case T‑295/06, Base v. Commission (electronic communications law, market access and competition)
  11. Case T-314/06, Whirlpool Europe v Council, (trade; pending)
  12. Case T-233/05, Nomura Principal Investment and Nomura International v Commission (transparency; settled)
  13. Case C-11/05, Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof te Amsterdam in the case of Friesland Coberco Dairy Foods BV, trading as Friesland Supply Point Ede v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Noord/kantoor Groningen  (trade)
  14. Case C-438/04, Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Cour d'Appel de Bruxelles, 9ème Chambre, by judgment of that court of 14 October 2004 in the case of Mobistar SA against Institut belge des services postaux et des télécommunications, joined parties, Belgacom Mobile SA and Base SA (electronic communications law, market access and competition)
  15. Case T-430/04, Nomura Principal Investment and Nomura v Commission (State aid; settled)
  16. Cases T-228/04 & T-218/04, Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission (State aid; settled)
  17. Case T-75/04, Arch Chemicals,Inc., Arch Timber Protection Limited and CEFIC v Commission (biocides regulation; pending)
  18. Joined Cases C-544/03 and C-545/03, Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Conseil d'État (Belgium) by order of that Court of 8 December 2003 in the case of S.A Mobistar against Commune de Fléron (electronic communications law, market access and taxation)
  19. Case T-383/03, Hynix Semiconductor v Council (common commercial policy)
  20. Case T-326/02, Kotug International and Others v Commission (State aid; settled)
  21. Case T-193/02, Laurent Piau v Commission (competition)
  22. Case T-48/02, Brouwerij Haacht v Commission (competition)
  23. Case T-58/01, Solvay SA v Commission (competition)
  24. Case T-57/01, Solvay SA v Commission (competition)
  25. Case T-389/00, Campina Melkunie B.V. v Commission (transparency; settled)
  26. Case C-64/00, Continental and Overseas Investments N.V. v Commission (trade; settled)
  27. Case C-236/99, Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (institutional law and environmental law)
  28. Case T-147/99, Miller N.V. and Others v Commission (trade)
  29. Case C-264/98, Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance de Charleroi (Belgium) by judgment of that court of 2 July 1998 in the case of Tibor Balog v. ASBL Royal Charleroi Sporting Club (competition; settled)
  30. Joined Cases T-172/98 and T-175/98 to T-177/98, Salamander AG, Una Film "City Revue" GmbH, Alma Media Group Advertising SA & Co. Partnership, Panel Two and Four Advertising SA, Rythmos Outdoor Advertising SA, Media Center Advertising SA, Zino Davidoff SA and Davidoff & Cie SA v Parliament and Council (institutional law, public health and marketing regulation)
  31. Case C-108/96, Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Première Instance de Bruxelles: Dennis Mac Quen, Derek Pouton, Carla Godts, Youssef Antoun and Grandvision Belgium SA, formerly Vision Express Belgium SA, being civilly liable; intervener: Union Professionnelle Belge des Médecins Spécialistes en Ophtalmologie et Chirurgie Oculaire, civil plaintiff (marketing regulation and public health)
  32. Case T-87/92, BVBA Kruidvat v. Commission (competition)
  33. Case C-60/92, Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arrondissementsrechtbank Amsterdam in the case of Otto BV v Postbank NV (competition)
  34. Joined cases C-48/90 & C-66/90, Kingdom of the Netherlands, Koninklijke PTT Nederland NV and PTT Post BV v Commission (public undertakings)